Successful Cases of GYLA Lawyers in December 2009
2010-01-26 08:01
V.A. vs. and I. and Z.Ch.
GYLA provided legal aid to a citizen V.A. who had filed against I.Ch. A traffic accident that occurred in October 21, 2006 was caused by the fault of a citizen I.Ch. V.A. filed for damage compensation.
GYLA lawyer and the defendant negotiated a deal; a negotiation act was drawn up, which was validated by the court ruling and entered the legal force. According to the agreement, the defendant was commissioned to pay 10 000 (ten thousand) GEL in favor of V.A.
Z.Gh. vs. Metro Builder Ltd.
GYLA provided legal aid to a citizen Z.Gh. who had filed against Metro Bulder Ltd. In June 2007 Metro Builder Ltd. had terminated the pay monthly pension - 127 GEL - to Z.Gh. in compensation for health damage. We claimed restoration of the noted payment and reimbursement of arrears that had been accumulated during the period between 2007 and restoration of the payment.
At the main court session GYLA lawyer and the defendant negotiated a deal, which was validated by the court ruling and entered the legal force. According to the agreement, defendant was commissioned to restore monthly pension to Z.Gh. in the amount of 127 (one hundred twenty-seven) GEL and reimburse the arrears – 3810 (three thousand eight hundred and ten) GEL in full amount by the end of 2010.
S.R. vs. Agency for Social Subsidies
GYLA provided legal aid to a citizen S.R. whose service pension of a breadwinner was terminated due to the fact that S.R. had reached legal age; S.R. was a student, which under the applicable Georgian law may serve as the basis for pension extension until the recipient reaches the age of 23. Nevertheless, the social services agency refused to restore pension to R.S. The case was reviewed in the first and the second court instances and our lawsuit claim was not satisfied.
Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia satisfied the claim of S.R. The Agency for Social Subsidies was commissioned to issue individual administrative-legal act on reinstatement of loss of breadwinner pension and to reimburse damages inflicted to the plaintiff for the period between termination of the pension and its restoration.
T.M. vs. Ministry of Refugees and Accommodation of Georgia
GYLA provided legal aid to T.M. affected by the August 2008 war. T.M. applied to the Ministry of Refugees and Accommodation of Georgia for granting the status of an IDP. Under the Law of Georgia on Internally Displaced Persons – Refugees, the ministry shall make the decision on granting or refusing to grant the status within one month; although the ministry neglected the application.
The ministry’s refusal to grant the status of an IDP to T.M. was appealed against in the board of administrative cases of Tbilisi City Court. The plaintiff demanded the ministry to be commissioned to issue an individual administrative-legal act within one month on granting the status of an IDP to T.M.
Ruling of the board of administrative cases of Tbilisi City Court satisfied T.M.’s claim.